Minnesota Board of Medical Practice advertising rules: a 2026 guide
Minnesota's Board of Medical Practice can discipline a physician for advertising that is false or misleading, that violates a board rule, or that "claims without substantiation the positive cure of any disease, or professional superiority to or greater skill than that possessed by another physician" (Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1(e)). The same section defines fee splitting in detail, and the Board can impose civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.
- Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1(e): advertising that is false or misleading, violates a Board rule, or claims without substantiation the positive cure of any disease or professional superiority to or greater skill than another physician.
- The wording targets unsubstantiated cure and superiority claims, so the substantiation file behind a comparative claim is what matters.
- Subd. 1(p) defines fee splitting to include paying or receiving a commission, rebate or remuneration primarily for referring patients or prescribing drugs or devices; dividing fees unless proportional to services and disclosed; and referring to an entity you have a financial interest in without the required disclosure.
- Disclosures under subd. 1(p) must be made in advance and in writing, and must tell the patient they are free to choose a different provider. Revenue distribution within a partnership, group practice or professional corporation is excepted.
- Under §147.141 the Board may impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each separate violation, set to remove any economic advantage gained or to reimburse investigation costs.
- Dallas, Texas LLC
- 10-person US client team · Central Time (CST)
- 25+ US healthcare clients
- BAA signed with every client
- HIPAA compliance training across client and delivery teams
- Contracts and invoices in USD
-
Primary Care · North Dallas, TXCase study →
-
MedSpa · North Dallas, TX
-
Skin Care · Beverly Hills, CA
-
Dental · Christiansburg, VACase study →
-
Pediatrics · Blacksburg, VACase study →
-
Pediatric Dentistry · Blacksburg, VACase study →
-
Dental · Roanoke, VACase study →
-
Functional Medicine · Telehealth · USACase study →
“They were able to get all my ideas and work with me over a period of three to four months and create this amazing website. It's super customized, very modern, and it incorporates all the elements that I had wanted — the patient portal, nice pictures, a very interactive website, patient reviews. I would highly recommend their company to anyone who wants to make an excellent website.”
Who regulates medical advertising in Minnesota
The Minnesota Board of Medical Practice licenses and disciplines physicians (MD and DO) and several other professions. Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1 lists the grounds for disciplinary action, and §147.141 lists the forms discipline can take. Dentists are regulated separately by the Minnesota Board of Dentistry.
Paragraph (e) of subd. 1 is the advertising ground. It covers three things: advertising that is false or misleading; advertising that violates any rule of the Board; and advertising that claims without substantiation the positive cure of any disease, or professional superiority to or greater skill than that possessed by another physician. The words "without substantiation" set Minnesota apart from states that ban superiority claims outright. A Minnesota practice can make a comparative claim, such as the number of procedures performed or a measurable outcome, but only if it can produce the evidence behind it. Vague superlatives such as "the best" are hard to substantiate at all, so they remain a poor choice.
Paragraph (p) is a detailed fee-splitting provision. It covers paying, offering to pay, receiving or agreeing to receive a commission, rebate or remuneration, directly or indirectly, primarily for the referral of patients or the prescription of drugs or devices. It covers dividing fees with another physician or a professional corporation unless the division is in proportion to the services provided and responsibility assumed, and the terms are disclosed. And it covers referring a patient to a health care provider in which the referring physician has a financial or economic interest, unless the interest is disclosed under §144.6521. The required disclosures must be made in advance and in writing, and must state that the patient is free to choose a different provider. Distribution of revenue within a partnership, group practice, nonprofit corporation or professional corporation to its own members is excepted.
Under §147.141 the Board may revoke or suspend a license, impose limits or conditions, and impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each separate violation, with the amount set to deprive the physician of any economic advantage gained or to reimburse the Board for the cost of the investigation and proceeding.
The Minnesota rules, citation by citation
These are the Minnesota provisions that most directly affect physician marketing and referral arrangements.
| Citation | What it says | What it means for your marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1(e) | Advertising that is false or misleading, violates a Board rule, or claims without substantiation the positive cure of any disease or professional superiority to or greater skill than another physician. | Comparative and cure claims need a substantiation file; avoid vague superlatives. |
| §147.091, subd. 1(p)(1) | Paying or receiving a commission, rebate or remuneration primarily for the referral of patients or the prescription of drugs or devices. | Per-referral payments to marketers or partners need legal review. |
| §147.091, subd. 1(p)(2) | Dividing fees with another physician or professional corporation unless proportional to services and responsibility, with terms disclosed. | Co-management and shared-care marketing must reflect real division of work. |
| §147.091, subd. 1(p)(3) and §144.6521 | Referring to a provider in which the physician has a financial interest without the required advance written disclosure, including that the patient is free to choose another provider. | Promotion of owned ancillary services should sit alongside the written disclosure. |
| Minn. Stat. §147.141 | Civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each separate violation, among other sanctions. | Repeated ad placements can mean repeated violations. |
Common ad elements: allowed, restricted, risky
Minnesota allows comparative claims that can be substantiated, which changes how some creative is judged compared with stricter states.
| Ad element | Status in Minnesota | Practical rule |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative or superiority claims | Allowed only with substantiation | Subd. 1(e) targets claims made "without substantiation." Keep the evidence on file. |
| Vague superlatives ("the best") | High risk | Hard to substantiate, so effectively unsupported. |
| Cure claims | Allowed only with substantiation | Positive cure claims need substantiation; for incurable conditions, avoid them. |
| Patient testimonials | Allowed with care | Not misleading; HIPAA authorization; incentives disclosed under FTC rules. |
| Before-and-after photos | Allowed with care | Own patients, unedited results, signed authorization. |
| Referral or lead payments | Restricted | Subd. 1(p)(1) covers remuneration primarily for referrals. |
| Owned ancillary service promotion | Allowed with obligations | Advance written financial-interest disclosure (subd. 1(p)(3)). |
Minnesota-specific points to watch
Substantiation, not a ban
Minnesota's text targets unsubstantiated cure and superiority claims. A measurable, documented comparison can be defensible; an unsupported one is not.
Written referral disclosures
Disclosures of fee divisions and financial interests must be made in advance and in writing, and must tell patients they are free to choose a different provider.
Prescription-linked payments
Subd. 1(p)(1) covers remuneration for the prescription of drugs or devices as well as for patient referrals, relevant to weight-loss and hormone programs that partner with pharmacies.
Penalties per violation
The $10,000 cap in §147.141 applies to each separate violation and is calibrated to remove any economic advantage gained.
How federal rules layer on top
A Minnesota board rule is only one layer. The same campaign also has to clear federal rules that apply in every state, and Minnesota's deceptive trade practices and consumer fraud laws (Minn. Stat. §325D.44 and §325F.69) can reach the same ad even when the board does not act.
- FTC Act, Section 5. Advertising may not be deceptive or unfair, and health claims need competent and reliable evidence behind them before they run.
- FTC Endorsement Guides (16 CFR Part 255). Testimonials must reflect the real experience and honest opinion of the person quoted. Free or discounted treatment, payment, employment or family ties are material connections that must be disclosed clearly. If a testimonial describes results, the FTC reads it as a claim that others can expect similar results, so you need support for that.
- FTC Rule on Consumer Reviews and Testimonials (16 CFR Part 465). In effect since October 21, 2024. It bans fake reviews and testimonials, buying reviews that are conditioned on what they say, undisclosed reviews by owners or staff, and using threats or false accusations to suppress negative reviews.
- HIPAA (45 CFR 164.508). Using a patient's information in marketing, including testimonials, photos and case stories, generally requires the patient's signed authorization. Replies to online reviews that confirm someone is a patient or discuss their care can be an impermissible disclosure, and HHS has settled enforcement cases with practices over review replies.
- TCPA (47 U.S.C. 227) and FCC rules. Marketing calls and texts sent with an autodialer or a prerecorded or artificial voice need the recipient's prior express written consent, and do-not-call rules apply.
In practice the strictest applicable rule wins. Our team reviews Minnesota campaigns against the board rules above first, then against this federal layer. You can read more about how we run that review on how we work.
Compliance checklist for Minnesota practices
Use this before any campaign goes live. The first items in each group come from the Minnesota rules above; the rest apply to every US practice.
Website and landing pages
- Every comparative or cure claim has a substantiation file (Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1(e)).
- Owned ancillary services are promoted alongside the advance written disclosure (subd. 1(p)(3)).
- Every factual claim (years in practice, procedure counts, awards, credentials) has a dated source you can produce on request.
- Provider bios state the license type and any board certification, naming the certifying board.
- Before-and-after galleries use the practice's own patients, unretouched beyond lighting, each backed by a signed HIPAA authorization.
Paid search and social ads
- No remuneration primarily for referrals or prescriptions in vendor or partner deals (subd. 1(p)(1)).
- Price, discount and "free" offers state their conditions in the ad or on the first page the click lands on.
- No promise of a specific outcome in headlines, extensions, thumbnails or video voice-over.
- The landing page identifies the practice entity and the clinician responsible for care.
Social media and influencers
- Paid or comped creators, patient ambassadors and staff disclose the relationship in the post itself, not only in a bio.
- Patient stories and photos are posted only with a current HIPAA marketing authorization on file.
Reviews and reputation
- Review requests go to all patients the same way; no gating, no incentives tied to positive reviews, no purchased reviews (16 CFR Part 465).
- Replies to online reviews never confirm that the reviewer is a patient or mention their care.
Records
- Keep dated copies of every ad, landing page, testimonial authorization and substantiation file, so you can answer a board inquiry quickly.
- Re-check this list whenever the Minnesota board or legislature changes its rules; the sources section shows where to look.
Minnesota medical advertising rules: common questions
What is Minnesota's rule on physician advertising?
Minn. Stat. §147.091, subd. 1(e) lets the Board of Medical Practice discipline physicians for advertising that is false or misleading, violates a Board rule, or claims without substantiation the positive cure of any disease or professional superiority to or greater skill than another physician.
Can Minnesota physicians make comparative claims?
Only with substantiation. The statute targets superiority claims made without substantiation, so a documented, measurable comparison is treated differently from an unsupported "best."
What counts as fee splitting in Minnesota?
Under §147.091, subd. 1(p): remuneration primarily for referrals or prescriptions; dividing fees unless proportional and disclosed; and referring to a provider in which you have a financial interest without the required disclosure. Written advance disclosure is required.
What fines can the Minnesota Board impose?
Under §147.141 the Board may impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each separate violation, along with other sanctions such as suspension or revocation.
Who regulates dental advertising in Minnesota?
The Minnesota Board of Dentistry, under its own statutes and rules. The federal FTC, HIPAA and TCPA rules on this page apply to dental practices too.
Is this guide legal advice for my Minnesota practice?
No. It is marketing guidance written against the Minnesota sources listed below as of 2026. Rules change and boards interpret them case by case, so confirm specific claims with a health care attorney licensed in Minnesota or with the board before you publish.
Sources
Official Minnesota sources first, then the federal rules. We read each one for this guide in 2026; check for later amendments before relying on a specific provision.
- Minn. Stat. §147.091, Grounds for disciplinary action (Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes)
- Minn. Stat. §147.141, Forms of disciplinary action
- Minnesota Board of Medical Practice
- FTC Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, 16 CFR Part 255
- FTC Trade Regulation Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials, 16 CFR Part 465
- HIPAA Privacy Rule, uses and disclosures requiring authorization (marketing), 45 CFR 164.508
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227
Neighboring states and related guides
Get your Minnesota marketing reviewed before a complaint does it for you
A member of our Sr. Leadership team will walk through your website, ads and review replies against the Minnesota rules on this page and the federal layer, and tell you what to change first. Engagements start from $499/month, custom-scoped, with Goals-Driven engagements and Performance-Linked Payout Models available. Every US client signs a Business Associate Agreement with Ichelon Consulting US.